FIFA Faces Scrutiny Over Increased Carbon Footprint of 2026 World Cup

Environmental Concerns Mount Ahead of the Tournament

FIFA is once again under fire as environmental groups and sustainability advocates raise alarms over the projected carbon footprint of the 2026 World Cup. With the tournament set to span three countries – the United States, Canada, and Mexico – and involve 48 teams for the first time, experts warn that emissions will significantly exceed those of previous editions.

Expanded Format Equals Larger Environmental Cost

The 2026 World Cup will be the most expansive in history, increasing from 32 to 48 teams and spreading across 16 cities in North America. This expanded format means:

• Increased air travel for teams, fans, and officials
• Higher energy needs for stadiums and infrastructure
• More construction and renovation projects across host cities

According to recent estimates, the tournament could generate millions of metric tons of CO₂ equivalent emissions. This contrasts sharply with FIFA's past commitments to carbon neutrality and sustainability goals.

FIFA's Climate Promises Under Investigation

FIFA previously pledged to reduce its environmental impact and offset emissions through various carbon-reduction programs. However, watchdog groups argue that the organization has offered little transparency or proof of the results of these offsetting measures.

“FIFA continues to market sustainability without addressing the scale of its environmental footprint,” said one climate researcher. “Expansion at this scale is inherently damaging unless paired with real accountability.”

Call for Action from Environmental Advocates

Environmental organizations and NGOs are urging FIFA to:

• Publish detailed emission projections and mitigation plans
• Invest heavily in public transport, green infrastructure, and renewable energy for host cities
• Commit to third-party audits of their sustainability initiatives

With less than a year until kickoff, pressure is mounting for FIFA to demonstrate genuine leadership in sustainable sports. The world will be watching not only the matches but also how the global football body lives up to its environmental responsibilities.

Conclusion

As excitement builds for the 2026 World Cup, so do fears over its environmental cost. FIFA’s ongoing expansion and ambitious hosting strategies must now align with credible, measurable sustainability efforts—or risk damaging the planet in the name of the beautiful game.